Opinion | Changing dynamics of the TJ process
Summary
Nepal's transitional justice process, initiated by the 2006 Comprehensive Peace Agreement, faces challenges due to political influences, victim distrust, and commission inefficacy, with calls for increased dialogue and victim-inclusive reforms.
Key Points
- The transitional justice process in Nepal began with the 2006 Comprehensive Peace Agreement to address human rights violations during conflict.
- Despite multiple commissions formed under the 2014 TJ Act and its 2024 amendment, outcomes have been unsatisfactory, leading to victim distrust and criticism.
- Victim organizations accuse political influence and lack of consultation in the nomination of commissioners and demand more inclusive, victim-centered processes.
- Recommendations include enhanced dialogue with victim groups, revised complaint procedures, inclusion of women representatives, and focus on fair relief for torture and sexual violence victims.
