Small-state realism: An alternative to inconsistent, individual-centric diplomacy
Summary
Nepal’s foreign policy is being criticized as overly personal and inconsistent, with secretive meetings and ad hoc diplomacy undermining institutional consistency. The article urges a balanced, non-alignment approach focused on national interests, especially in relations with India and China.
Key Points
- The article criticizes Nepal’s leader-centric diplomacy and cites secretive meetings involving senior figures as examples of weak institutional conduct.
- It argues that foreign policy should be guided by national interest, transparency, and stable institutions rather than personal preferences.
- The writer recommends a small-state realism approach and a balanced non-alignment policy for Nepal.
- It calls for open and institutional engagement with India and other countries, especially Nepal’s immediate neighbors.
