Courts Rely on Executive for Enforcement, Facing Delays
Summary
Courts in Nepal are struggling to enforce their orders because implementation depends on the executive branch, which often delays or ignores rulings. Senior Advocate Dr. Tripathi says weak political will, bureaucratic obstacles and judicial caution have left major decisions on issues like jail reform, the Bagmati river and Chure exploitation unimplemented for years.
Key Points
- Court decisions in Nepal depend on the executive branch for enforcement, and many rulings remain unimplemented for years.
- The article cites delays in major cases including jail reform, Bagmati river cleanup, Bamdev Gautam’s National Assembly appointment and Agni Sapkota’s case.
- The executive is criticized for ignoring Supreme Court orders, including a ruling to stop Chure exploitation.
- Senior Advocate Dr. Tripathi says the judiciary must be more proactive and show greater judicial courage.
