Ordinances preferred tool of government, no matter who leads it
Summary
Nepal's government has drawn criticism for repeatedly using ordinances to bypass Parliament, especially by proroguing sessions and issuing multiple ordinances despite having a parliamentary majority. The practice, intended for urgent cases, has become a routine legislative shortcut impacting political stability and constitutional processes.
Key Points
- Nepal's government prorogued a summoned parliamentary session and then introduced multiple ordinances, sparking widespread criticism.
- The use of ordinances, meant for exceptional circumstances, has become a routine method to bypass parliamentary debate and legislation.
- Ordinances have frequently been used to amend laws on political parties and the Constitutional Council, impacting political alliances and appointments.
- Experts highlight the double standards of political parties regarding ordinances, depending on their position in government or opposition.
