Opinion | The act of voting carefully
Summary
Nepal's election cycles are marked by repeated promises and agitation replacing reasoned political discourse, urging voters to choose carefully based on capacity and policy rather than anger and provocation.
Key Points
- Nepal's elections increasingly rely on agitation and emotional provocation instead of reasoned argument and policy explanation.
- Political leaders avoid accountability by blaming others and framing governance failures as conspiracy.
- Permanent political agitation manipulates citizens instead of empowering them and hinders governance effectiveness.
- Voters are urged to vote carefully, valuing political capacity and explanation over charisma and provocation to drive democratic change.
